So as we complete this, let us think about what it is we're trying to accomplish. Here you see four area grid with impact and likelihood as our axes. In general, what we're trying to do is move from the upper right to the lower left in terms of how we want the strategy to go and what final result we'd like to achieve. Which is basically to reduce the risk in terms of impact and likelihood of occurrence.

We have to bear in mind that some of our risk threat vulnerability asset scenarios are not going to be amenable to reducing the threat, the impact or some other aspect. In the case of impact, as we move from the upper to the lower quadrants, we find that we go from high impact to low. As we move horizontally from the right to the left, we find that we reduce likelihood from high to low.

We have to bear in mind that some of these scenarios are not going to change in any respect. A threat that's in the high impact, high likelihood may stay because there's nothing effective that we can do about it. On the other hand, it may move only in one direction, from high impact to low or from high likelihood to low.

Whatever benefit we can get against either impact or likelihood should work in our favor to reduce the risk overall and provide us the ability to reduce proactively or reactively or in combination, the threat risk scenarios that can cause outages in our business.