Bluemix OpenWhisk: IBM’s Function as a Service

OpenWhisk is the first OSS Serverless platform

IBM announced OpenWhisk as an experimental event-driven compute platform earlier this year. As one of the latest FaaS solutions on the market, it offers some unique functionalities worth exploring.
The project is completely open-source, and you can deploy it on any infrastructure, and always on the IBM Bluemix platform.

Bluemix OpenWhisk: IBM's Function as a Service

What is IBM Bluemix?

IBM Bluemix went live at the beginning of 2014. It is based on the Cloud Foundry open-source technology, on top of the SoftLayer infrastructure.
Interestingly, Cloud Foundry was initially developed by VMWare, and it’s built in Ruby and Go, while OpenWhisk’s code base is mostly Scala and Python.
Bluemix offers a wide suite of private and hybrid Cloud solutions, including bare metal servers, virtual serverscontainer management, object storage, data analytics, machine learning powered by Watson, a browser-based Swift sandbox, and OpenWhisk. It only supports three regions for now: the southern U.S., Sydney, and the UK.
In this article, I will showcase OpenWhisk and compare it to the main Serverless/FaaS alternatives. I already compared Google Cloud Functions and AWS Lambda, and I’ll be working on more comparison articles soon.

OpenWhisk main concepts

The OpenWhisk model defines five basic concepts:

  • Actions: Actions correspond to Functions, which means your code plus an additional abstraction layer to make every function language-agnostic, thanks to a shared JSON interface.
  • Sequences: You can connect and chain multiple actions and leverage reusability and composability.
  • Triggers: An easy way to organize your event sources.
  • Rules: Connect Triggers and Actions with firing rules.
  • Packages: Packages allow you to bundle together a set of actions and share them with others.

As we will see, you can manipulate, share and interact with these objects in many ways to build your services catalog and automate their cooperation. And naturally, you can do so without managing, patching, or maintaining any server.

How can you interact with OpenWhisk?

You can use OpenWhisk on the official Bluemix web console, which provides a modern and user-friendly visual experience that is well integrated with the rest of the Bluemix suite.
In spite of looking beautiful and user-friendly, you cannot perform every operation directly from the console. I would highly recommend the OpenWhisk CLI (wsk) for automating operations. You can download the wsk executable here.
By default, every OpenWhisk action corresponds to a unique RESTful endpoint. You can access this endpoint via secure HTTPS requests (only POST, apparently). This pattern is compliant with the JSON input/output interface.
Additionally, you can also install the official iOS SDK. By using the mobile SDK, you can invoke your actions from any iOS device. In addition to OpenWhisk, the SDK also contains the code to access other Bluemix services, such as Mobile Data, Push, and Mobile Application Security.
OpenWhisk Welcome

What makes OpenWhisk unique?

OpenWhisk is still in Beta, and it currently covers the basic requirements to be a viable FaaS solution.
Some of its core concepts and functionalities make it different and unique compared to its FaaS competitors. Here is a non-exhaustive list:

1) Language support

The native support for specific programming languages can affect a FaaS platform’s adoption. I think IBM chose to be quite specific but also flexible at the same time.
You can currently choose one of the following options:

  • Node.js 0.12
  • Node.js 6
  • Python 2.7
  • Swift 2
  • Swift 3
  • Docker Images

The interesting options here are Swift and Docker.
Swift is an interesting choice because it allows iOS developers to build their mobile backend with the same client-side language that they are already familiar with.
On the other hand, Docker allows you to implement actions in any language, as long as you are compliant with the interface. I would say this is very flexible and powerful, although I would love to see native support for a wider set of languages, such as Java, Scala, PHP, Ruby, and Python 3, etc.

2) Built-in composability & reusability

The ability to connect, chain, and reuse your functions is a weak aspect of many FaaS solutions. The IBM team decided to make it a built-in feature. Indeed, you can create Sequences of Actions so that the output of the previous one will be the input of the next one.
In addition to Sequences, you also have a shared library of utility functions to make chainability easier. These functions will allow you to build smaller and more reusable building blocks. Plus, you can bundle and share these sets of functions as Packages.

3) Shared catalog of Packages

OpenWhisk comes with a ready-to-use set of Actions to automate 3rd party integrations and to simplify the interaction with other Bluemix services.
For example, you can bind GitHub, Slack, Weather, Watson, Cloudant, Mobile Push, WebSockets, and more to your sequences.
OpenWhisk Catalog

4) Language-agnostic default parameters

It might seem like a trivial feature, but it makes a developer’s life easier. Indeed, you can define default parameters for any function and language without changing the action’s code.
For example, you may define default parameters via CLI as follows:

wsk action update hello --param name John

This way, your function will be given a JSON object containing the default value “John” for your “name” parameter. Of course, you can pass a different value at invocation time and it will overwrite the default value. As you can see, this won’t change your JavaScript, Python, or Swift code at all.

5) Native HTTP integration

Another interesting detail is that you don’t need to configure anything at all to expose your actions via HTTP. OpenWhisk will automatically create an HTTP endpoint for each action. At the moment, you can only invoke actions via POST requests and Basic Authentication headers. As a complementary downside, it seems like this configuration cannot be customized.
For example, you would invoke your actions via cURL as follows:

URL="https://openwhisk.ng.bluemix.net/api/v1/namespaces/ABC/actions/XYZ?blocking=true"
BODY='{"name": "John"}'
KEY="XXX"
curl -d '$BODY' '$URL' -XPOST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -H 'Authorization: $KEY'

What’s still missing?

As with any beta release, OpenWhisk is still missing some critical features.
I will mention just a few:

1) Versioning and staging

I think the platform needs a clear and flexible way to deal with multiple Versions of the same Action. It also needs a mechanism to bind a version to specific endpoints and environments (e.g. dev, prod, etc.).
For now, you can only define Organizations and Spaces at the Bluemix account level, which might help work around the problem but it won’t make your life any easier.

2) HTTP customizations

It’s currently not possible to design a RESTful API. You can’t define custom paths or bind different Actions to each HTTP method (i.e. GET, POST, PUT, etc.). As mentioned above, the current HTTP integration is completely automatic and very easy to use, but it’s not aligned with the REST principles yet.

3) Lack of documentation

The official documentation doesn’t cover some major details about the CLI yet. For example, I couldn’t find how to deal with code packaging for Python and Swift dependencies.
I am personally quite hopeful about this, since the documentation is open source too, and everyone can contribute. I have already fixed a typo myself with a PR on Github.

4) Server-side Swift issues

As for the official documentation, Swift actions run in a Linux environment and use the latest available release, which is not necessarily stable. It means that the Swift version might be different from the stable releases of XCode.
I would assume that this will need to change sometime soon to make OpenWhisk a real mobile backend alternative.

OpenWhisk Technical Limitations

Every FaaS solution comes with different technical limitations and constraints that might affect how you develop your functions.
Here is a summary of the main limitations, which may change in the future once OpenWhisk goes out of Beta:

  • Execution time: max 5min
  • Memory allocation: max 512MB
  • Logs size: max 10MB
  • Code size: max 48MB
  • Payload size: max 1MB
  • Parameters size: max 1MB
  • Concurrent invocations per Namespace: max 1000
  • Invocations per minute: max 5000
  • Triggers firing per minute: max 5000

I think that the biggest constraint, compared to other FaaS competitors, is the maximum code size. In some cases, your code might weight more than 48MB if you need many auxiliary files or large libraries.
I guess these limits will change after the Beta and I’m also looking forward to the official pricing.

Conclusion

I think that OpenWhisk has great potential. Its GitHub project reached 45 contributors in less than nine months and the community seems to be growing fast. Transparency and customizability may be its winning points, although the ability to provide high-quality performance and unique features will play an important role too.
In my next article, I will compare OpenWhisk to the main serverless alternatives, including, AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, and others.
If you are interested in Serverless technologies, you may want to re-watch the webinar Introduction to the Serverless Paradigm by Austen Collins and me, or read my previous Google Cloud Functions VS AWS Lambda comparison.

 

 

Avatar

Written by

Alex Casalboni

Alex is a Software Engineer with a great passion for music and web technologies. He's experienced in web development and software design, with a particular focus on frontend and UX.


Related Posts

Patrick Navarro
Patrick Navarro
— January 22, 2020

Top 5 AWS Salary Report Findings

At the speed the cloud tech space is developing, it can be hard to keep track of everything that’s happening within the AWS ecosystem. Advances in technology prompt smarter functionality and innovative new products, which in turn give rise to new job roles that have a ripple effect on t...

Read more
  • AWS
  • salary
Alisha Reyes
Alisha Reyes
— January 6, 2020

New on Cloud Academy: Red Hat, Agile, OWASP Labs, Amazon SageMaker Lab, Linux Command Line Lab, SQL, Git Labs, Scrum Master, Azure Architects Lab, and Much More

Happy New Year! We hope you're ready to kick your training in overdrive in 2020 because we have a ton of new content for you. Not only do we have a bunch of new courses, hands-on labs, and lab challenges on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, but we also have three new courses on Red Hat, th...

Read more
  • agile
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • Linux
  • OWASP
  • programming
  • red hat
  • scrum
Alisha Reyes
Alisha Reyes
— December 24, 2019

Cloud Academy’s Blog Digest: Azure Best Practices, 6 Reasons You Should Get AWS Certified, Google Cloud Certification Prep, and more

Happy Holidays from Cloud Academy We hope you have a wonderful holiday season filled with family, friends, and plenty of food. Here at Cloud Academy, we are thankful for our amazing customer like you.  Since this time of year can be stressful, we’re sharing a few of our latest article...

Read more
  • AWS
  • azure best practices
  • blog digest
  • Cloud Academy
  • Google Cloud
Avatar
Guy Hummel
— December 12, 2019

Google Cloud Platform Certification: Preparation and Prerequisites

Google Cloud Platform (GCP) has evolved from being a niche player to a serious competitor to Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure. In 2019, research firm Gartner placed Google in the Leaders quadrant in its Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure as a Service for the second consecuti...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Google Cloud Platform
Alisha Reyes
Alisha Reyes
— December 10, 2019

New Lab Challenges: Push Your Skills to the Next Level

Build hands-on experience using real accounts on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and more Meaningful cloud skills require more than book knowledge. Hands-on experience is required to translate knowledge into real-world results. We see this time and time again in studies about how pe...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • hands-on
  • labs
Alisha Reyes
Alisha Reyes
— December 5, 2019

New on Cloud Academy: AWS Solution Architect Lab Challenge, Azure Hands-on Labs, Foundation Certificate in Cyber Security, and Much More

Now that Thanksgiving is over and the craziness of Black Friday has died down, it's now time for the busiest season of the year. Whether you're a last-minute shopper or you already have your shopping done, the holidays bring so much more excitement than any other time of year. Since our...

Read more
  • AWS
  • AWS solution architect
  • AZ-203
  • Azure
  • cyber security
  • FCCS
  • Foundation Certificate in Cyber Security
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • Kubernetes
Avatar
Cloud Academy Team
— December 4, 2019

Understanding Enterprise Cloud Migration

What is enterprise cloud migration? Cloud migration is about moving your data, applications, and even infrastructure from your on-premises computers or infrastructure to a virtual pool of on-demand, shared resources that offer compute, storage, and network services at scale. Why d...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Data Migration
Wendy Dessler
Wendy Dessler
— November 27, 2019

6 Reasons Why You Should Get an AWS Certification This Year

In the past decade, the rise of cloud computing has been undeniable. Businesses of all sizes are moving their infrastructure and applications to the cloud. This is partly because the cloud allows businesses and their employees to access important information from just about anywhere. ...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Certifications
  • certified
Avatar
Andrea Colangelo
— November 26, 2019

AWS Regions and Availability Zones: The Simplest Explanation You Will Ever Find Around

The basics of AWS Regions and Availability Zones We’re going to treat this article as a sort of AWS 101 — it’ll be a quick primer on AWS Regions and Availability Zones that will be useful for understanding the basics of how AWS infrastructure is organized. We’ll define each section,...

Read more
  • AWS
Avatar
Dzenan Dzevlan
— November 20, 2019

Application Load Balancer vs. Classic Load Balancer

What is an Elastic Load Balancer? This post covers basics of what an Elastic Load Balancer is, and two of its examples: Application Load Balancers and Classic Load Balancers. For additional information — including a comparison that explains Network Load Balancers — check out our post o...

Read more
  • ALB
  • Application Load Balancer
  • AWS
  • Elastic Load Balancer
  • ELB
Albert Qian
Albert Qian
— November 13, 2019

Advantages and Disadvantages of Microservices Architecture

What are microservices? Let's start our discussion by setting a foundation of what microservices are. Microservices are a way of breaking large software projects into loosely coupled modules, which communicate with each other through simple Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). ...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Docker
  • Kubernetes
  • Microservices
Nisar Ahmad
Nisar Ahmad
— November 12, 2019

Kubernetes Services: AWS vs. Azure vs. Google Cloud

Kubernetes is a popular open-source container orchestration platform that allows us to deploy and manage multi-container applications at scale. Businesses are rapidly adopting this revolutionary technology to modernize their applications. Cloud service providers — such as Amazon Web Ser...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • Kubernetes