How to Use Consistency Models for Amazon Web Services

If you’re interested in learning how consistency models on AWS can help you write stable, reliable applications, then this is the article for you. By following a consistency model, your application’s memory will remain consistent and the results of any operations on its memory should be predictable. (Editor’s Note: This is complex material. If you’d like to brush up on your understanding of storage in AWS, check out this course.)

Consistency Models Create Structure and Rules around Memory to Ensure Application Reliability

In very simple terms,  consistency models define rules for the order and visibility of read and updates.

Distributed systems are large and replicated across many servers, allow concurrent execution of components, are prone to failure, experience transaction delays, and have no global time. Objects in a distributed storage system are replicated to avoid single-point failures and improve both reliability and availability to avoid overload of transactions in a single system and to give faster access to local copies to avoid communication delay.

But all these virtues of a distributed system come at a price as multiple copies of data need to be kept identical. This requirement brought the necessities of a suitable consistency model for different distributed services such as storage, memory, or a NoSQL offering.

Broadly speaking, there are two types of consistency models: Data-centric and client-centric. Let’s take a look at both of them.

Data-Centric Consistency Models

Tanenbaum & Maarten Van Steen, two computer scientists who are experts in this field, define the consistency model as a contract between the software (processes) and memory implementation (data store). This model guarantees that if the software follows certain rules, the memory works correctly. Since, in a system without a global clock, defining the last operation writes is difficult, some restrictions should be applied on the values that can be returned by a read operation.

The following models are the data-centric consistency models according to their strictness in descending order – the strictest models are listed first:

Models Description
 Strict Consistency Absolute time ordering of all shared accesses matters
 Linearizability Consistency All processes must see all shared accesses in the same order.  Accesses are furthermore ordered according to a (non-unique) global timestamp
Sequential Consistency All processes see all shared accesses in the same order.  Accesses are not ordered in time
 Causal Consistency All processes see causally-related shared accesses in the same order.
 FIFO Consistency All processes see writes from each other in the order they were used.  Writes from different processes may not always be seen in that order
 Weak Consistency Shared data can be counted on to be consistent only after a synchronization is done
 Release Consistency Shared data are made consistent when a critical region is exited
 Entry Consistency Shared data pertaining to a critical region are made consistent when a critical region is entered.

Client-Centric Consistency Models

In a client-centric consistency model, the emphasis is put on how data is seen by the clients. The data can be varying from clients to clients if data replication is not complete. Faster data access is the primary concern, so we might opt for a less-strict consistency model such as eventual consistency.

Eventual Consistency

In this approach,the system informally ensures that, if no new updates are made to a particular piece of data, eventually all reads to that item will return the last updated value. The updated replicas send the update messages to all other replicas. In these states different replicas could return different values if queried, but eventually all the replicas get the update and will be consistent. This model is suitable for hundreds of thousands of concurrent reads are writes per second such as Twitter updates, Instagram photo uploads, Facebook status pages, messaging systems, and so on where data integrity concern is not paramount.

Read-Your-Write Consistency

RYW (Read-Your-Writes) consistency is achieved when the system guarantees that, once a record has been updated, any attempt to read the record will return the updated value. RDBMS generally gives read-your-write consistency.

Read-after-Write Consistency

Read-after-write consistency is stricter than eventual consistency. A newly inserted data item or record will be immediately visible to all the clients. Please note that it is only applicable to new data. Updates and deletions are not considered in this model.

Amazon S3 Consistency Models

Amazon S3 provides read-after-write consistency for PUTS of new objects in your S3 bucket and eventual consistency for overwrite PUTS and DELETES in all regions.  So, if you add a new object to your bucket, you and your clients will see it. But, if you overwrite an object, it might take some time to update its replicas – hence the eventual consistency model is applied.

Amazon S3 guarantees high-availability by replicating data across many servers and AZs. It is obvious that data integrity should be maintained if a new record is added or a record/data is updated and deleted. The scenarios for above cases are as follows:

  • A new PUT request is made. The object might not appear in the list if queried immediately until the changes are propagated to all the servers and AZs. The read-after-write consistency model is applied here.
  • An UPDATE request is made. As eventual consistency model is applied for UPDATEs, a query to list the object might return an old value.
  • A DELETE request is made. As eventual consistency model is applied for DELETEs, a query to list or read the object might return the deleted object.

Amazon DynamoDB Consistency Models

Amazon DynamoDB is one of the most popular NoSQL service from AWS. NoSQL storage is inherently distributed. To enable high availability and data durability, Amazon DynamoDB stores three geographically distributed replicas of each table. A write operation in DynamoDB adheres to eventual consistency. A read operation (GetItem, BatchGetItem, Query or Scan operations) on DyanamoDB table is eventual consistent read by default. But, you can configure a strong consistent read request for the most recent data. Note that a strong consistent read operation consumes twice the read units than eventual consistent read request. In general, it is advised to follow eventual consistent read because the change propagation in DynamoDB is very fast (DynamoDB uses SSDs for low-latency) and you will get the same result with the half of the cost of a strong read consistent request.

Conclusion

Phew! That was a lot of information. I hope you now have at least some idea about the different types of consistency models. AWS’s distributed paradigm means its services have to adopt consistency models which best suits the performance and consistency of data or objects.

Want to learn more? Try Cloud Academy for free for 7-days. Here are a few courses and learning paths that might interest you:

You’ll learn everything you need to know to successfully develop reliable and dependable AWS applications – as well as pass AWS certification exams on the first try. We look forward to working together with you to upgrade your career!

Avatar

Written by

Chandan Patra

Cloud Computing and Big Data professional with 10 years of experience in pre-sales, architecture, design, build and troubleshooting with best engineering practices. Specialities: Cloud Computing - AWS, DevOps(Chef), Hadoop Ecosystem, Storm & Kafka, ELK Stack, NoSQL, Java, Spring, Hibernate, Web Service


Related Posts

Amanda Cross
Amanda Cross
— April 9, 2021

New Content: Platforms, Programming, and DevOps – Something for Everyone

This month our team of expert certification specialists released three new or updated learning paths, 16 courses, 13 hands-on labs, and four lab challenges! New content on Cloud Academy You can always visit our Content Roadmap to see what’s just released as well as what’s coming soon....

Read more
  • alibaba
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • DevOps
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • programming
  • Security
Luca Casartelli
Luca Casartelli
— March 31, 2021

Mastering AWS Organizations Service Control Policies

Service Control Policies (SCPs) are IAM-like policies to manage permissions in AWS Organizations. SCPs restrict the actions allowed for accounts within the organization making each one of them compliant with your guidelines. SCPs are not meant to grant permissions; you should consider ...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Organizations
  • SCP
Amanda Cross
Amanda Cross
— March 12, 2021

New Content: Focus on DevOps and Programming Content this Month

This month our team of expert certification specialists released 12 new or updated learning paths, 15 courses, 25 hands-on labs, and four lab challenges! New content on Cloud Academy You can always visit our Content Roadmap to see what’s just released as well as what’s coming soon. Ja...

Read more
  • alibaba
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • DevOps
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • programming
Amanda Cross
Amanda Cross
— February 12, 2021

New Content: Get Ready for the CISM Cert Exam & Learn About Alibaba, Plus All the AWS, GCP, and Azure Courses You Know You Can Count On

This month our team of intrepid certification specialists released five learning paths, seven courses, 19 hands-on labs, and three lab challenges!  One particularly interesting new learning path is Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) Foundations. After completing this learn...

Read more
  • alibaba
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • cism
  • DevOps
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • programming
Avatar
Cloud Academy Team
— January 31, 2021

Which Certifications Should I Get?

The old AWS slogan, “Cloud is the new normal” is indeed a reality today. Really, cloud has been the new normal for a while now and getting credentials has become an increasingly effective way to quickly showcase your abilities to recruiters and companies. With all that in mind, the s...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Certifications
  • Cloud Computing
  • Google Cloud Platform
Avatar
Andrew Larkin
— January 31, 2021

The 12 AWS Certifications: Which is Right for You and Your Team?

As companies increasingly shift workloads to the public cloud, cloud computing has moved from a nice-to-have to a core competency in the enterprise. This shift requires a new set of skills to design, deploy, and manage applications in cloud computing. As the market leader and most ma...

Read more
  • AWS
  • AWS Certifications
Avatar
Stuart Scott
— January 29, 2021

AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate: A Study Guide

Want to take a really impactful step in your technical career? Explore the AWS Solutions Architect Associate certificate. Its new version (SAA-C02) was released on March 23, 2020. The AWS Solutions Architect - Associate Certification (or Sol Arch Associate for short) offers some ...

Read more
  • AWS
  • AWS Certifications
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate
Amanda Cross
Amanda Cross
— January 7, 2021

New Content: AWS Terraform, Java Programming Lab Challenges, Azure DP-900 & DP-300 Certification Exam Prep, Plus Plenty More Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Big Data Courses

This month our Content Team continues building the catalog of courses for everyone learning about AWS, GCP, and Microsoft Azure. In addition, this month’s updates include several Java programming lab challenges and a couple of courses on big data. In total, we released five new learning...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • DevOps
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • Machine Learning
  • programming
Avatar
Stuart Scott
— December 17, 2020

Where Should You Be Focusing Your AWS Security Efforts?

Another day, another re:Invent session! This time I listened to Stephen Schmidt’s session, “AWS Security: Where we've been, where we're going.” Amongst covering the highlights of AWS security during 2020, a number of newly added AWS features/services were discussed, including: AWS Audit...

Read more
  • AWS
  • AWS re:Invent
  • cloud security
Joe Nemer
Joe Nemer
— December 4, 2020

AWS re:Invent: 2020 Keynote Top Highlights and More

We’ve gotten through the first five days of the special all-virtual 2020 edition of AWS re:Invent. It’s always a really exciting time for practitioners in the field to see what features and services AWS has cooked up for the year ahead.  This year’s conference is a marathon and not a...

Read more
  • AWS
  • AWS Glue Elastic Views
  • AWS re:Invent
Bryony Harrower
Bryony Harrower
— November 6, 2020

WARNING: Great Cloud Content Ahead

At Cloud Academy, content is at the heart of what we do. We work with the world’s leading cloud and operations teams to develop video courses and learning paths that accelerate teams and drive digital transformation. First and foremost, we listen to our customers’ needs and we stay ahea...

Read more
  • AWS
  • Azure
  • content roadmap
  • GCP
Joe Nemer
Joe Nemer
— October 25, 2020

Excelling in AWS, Azure, and Beyond – How Danut Prisacaru Prepares for the Future

Meet Danut Prisacaru. Danut has been a Software Architect for the past 10 years and has been involved in Software Engineering for 30 years. He’s passionate about software and learning, and jokes that coding is basically the only thing he can do well (!). We think his enthusiasm shines t...

Read more
  • AWS
  • careers
  • champions
  • upskilling