Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: AWS Cloud Search Choices

Let’s compare AWS-based cloud tools Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch. While both use proven technologies, Elasticsearch is more popular (and open source), and CloudSearch is fully managed.

In part one of this series, we described what search engines are, how they solve the problem of accessing content stretched across large websites, and how Amazon CloudSearch provides a solution for a cloud environment. AWS CloudSearch is certainly a powerful and appealing service from Amazon. However, there are more popular players in the search engine market, and Elasticsearch ranks right behind Solr as the most popular search and analytics engine. We’ll explore the battle of the Amazon search providers: Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: provisioning

Both Elasticsearch and CloudSearch are provided by Amazon as AWS services. However, Elasticsearch is an independent product developed by elastic.co, which means you can set up Elasticsearch independently by downloading and extracting the tar ball, or through a yum/apt-get install.
Amazon CloudSearch, on the other hand, is fully managed by AWS, which, once you choose your instance type, handles the complete provisioning. Users are able to select High-Availability (AZ level), replication, and partitioning options through the AWS Management Console or AWS CLI.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Upgrading

Elasticsearch is easy to upgrade. The process can be as easy as replacing the lib folder of an older version with a new version.
Updates of Amazon CloudSearch are pushed by AWS, relieving users of the responsibility. However, this might result in delayed upgrades of new releases.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Data import/export

When existing data need to be searchable, they should be imported to the search engines. In Elasticsearch, there are plugins called “rivers” to push data into a cluster. There are many popular river plugins available such as elasticsearch–river- mongodb, elasticsearch-river-couchdb, Elasticsearch-jdbc. However, for various reasons, river plugins are being deprecated.
Logstash Forwarders, are normally used to push logs from application or database servers to Elasticsearch. This makes them available for searching logs or to plot graphs in Kibana. Recently, Logstash and input_changes plugins have taken center stage to replace rivers as tools to push data to Elasticsearch, too. Some of the recently developed input_changes are couchdb_changes, twitter, and rabbitmq.
In Amazon CloudSearch, data and documents (in either XML or JSON format) are pushed in batches. Data can also be pushed to S3, with the data path given to index the documents.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Data and index backup

In Elasticsearch, data is backed up (and restored) using the Snapshot and Restore module. Usually, users are required to define a shared mount path. In the cloud, they can instead opt for Amazon S3, HDFS, or Azure storage. Curator is a tool that acts as a cron job manager that users can set to automate the backup process.
In Amazon CloudSearch, the service itself takes care of the whole backup process, once again sparing users the bother. Unlike Elasticsearch, where users must manually run the restore activity from backed up indexes, CloudSearch does it automatically.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Security and User Management   

Elasticsearch provides a plugin called shield to handle authentication and authorization. Shield also provides features like encryption, role-based access control, IP filtering, and auditing. However, shield is a licensed product that must be purchased. You can also integrate your AD server to control access locally.
Amazon CloudSearch provides IAM-based access control.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Cluster management

In Elasticsearch, adding or deleting nodes within a cluster must be done manually. If the cluster instances are upgraded – i.e. vertical scaling – then you’ll need to run through the set up process from scratch. Old data must be backed up and restored to the new cluster. In the case of horizontal scaling, where servers are added or removed from cluster, cluster rebalancing and resharding is mandatory. These, too, are manual processes. Users need to be very careful during the process.
Amazon CloudSearch, on the other hand, has built-in scaling and upgrade tools. When a server in a CloudSearch service reaches its threshold, it automatically upgrades to the next larger instance type. And when the capacity goes beyond the largest available instance types, the index is partitioned into multiple instances.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Monitoring

In Elasticsearch, there are cluster monitoring tools like Marvel which allow a user to send RESTful queries to check cluster health. Another product called Watcher provides an alerting mechanism. These tools are all provided by Elasticsearch itself. Users can, of course, also bring their own monitoring tools, like SPM or the New Relic plugin for Elasticsearch to keep an eye on their clusters.
Amazon CloudSearch is fully integrated with Amazon Cloudwatch, which can monitor metrics like SuccessfulRequests, Searchable Documents, Index Utilization, and Partition Count. Like Watcher in Elasticsearch, AWS Simple Notification Service (SNS) can be integrated with CloudSearch for alerting.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: High Availability

As they’re both built for running search engines in the cloud, Elasticsearch and CloudSearch are designed for high availability.
Elasticsearch is built for distributed computing where the cluster grows horizontally. The indexes are split into shards and replication factors provide shard redundancy. Whenever a node fails, the replicated shards are used to replace lost data. Elasticsearch employs a technique called zen discovery, where all the nodes communicate with each other through an “elected” master. In case the master node fails, another node takes over as master.
Similar architecture is followed in CloudSearch to handle failure and provide HA. CloudSearch also has an optional feature for multi-AZ replication within a single region to provide HA and Availability Zone failover.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Search and Indexing

In Elasticsearch, searching happens on both index and types using a search API.  The search API also includes Faceting and Filtering for searching data.
In CloudSearch, users create a search domain which includes sub-services to upload documents. A search service provides the means to search indexed data.
In Elasticsearch, many built-in libraries are provided for analyzers, tokenizers, and filters for indexing.
Amazon CloudSearch, on the other hand, provides a much simpler configuration service for all indexing operations and relevance ranking.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Client Libraries

There are many clients available for Elasticsearch. Official clients are Java API, .NET, Ruby, Groovy, PHP, PERL, Python, and JavaScript. Elasticsearch also supports RESTful APIs.
Amazon CloudSearch supports many SDKs along with RESTful API calls. The most popular SDKs are in Java, Ruby, Python, .Net, PHP, and Node.js.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Cost

As Elasticsearch requires manual set up, the true cost of deployment must include infrastructure costs, licensing for all non-open source software tools and the OS, and the Elasticsearch binary. This may require a large operational expenditure to cover skilled Elasticsearch admins and a monitoring team.
Amazon CloudSearch is priced according to the search instance size. Here’s an example:

With Multi-AZ enabled, the cost of redundant search instances will also be added. If an index is partitioned, the cost of each new search instance in each AZ is also added to the cost.

CloudSearch document batch uploads

Document batch upload costs are $0.10 per 1,000 Batch Upload Requests (the maximum size for each batch is 5 MB).

CloudSearch IndexDocuments requests

Re-indexing is required for indexes when a new field is added to index. The charge for a re-indexing request is $0.98 per GB of data stored in your search domain.

CloudSearch data transfer

Inbound data transfers are free between Amazon CloudSearch and other AWS Services. There are charges for outbound data transfers:

• Data transferred between Amazon CloudSearch and AWS services in different regions will be charged as Internet Data Transfers on both sides of the transfer.
• Traffic sent between Amazon CloudSearch and Amazon EC2 instances in the same region is only billed for the Data Transfer in and out of the Amazon EC2 instances. Standard Amazon EC2 Regional Data Transfer charges apply.

Elasticsearch vs CloudSearch: Conclusion

Both Elasticsearch and Amazon CloudSearch are built on proven technologies and are the choice of many demanding organizations. Because of its flexibility and active developer community, Elasticsearch is more popular. But Amazon CloudSearch scores when it comes to operational efficiency.
Because of its popularity, AWS provides Elasticsearch as a Service (Amazon Elasticsearch Service) which, in many ways, provides best of both worlds. Elastic.co also provides Elasticsearch as a cloud service Found.
What do you think? Was this helpful for determining the finer points of each service? Comments welcome and appreciated.